Synopsis– The cryptocurrency industry stands at a critical crossroads as longtime market patterns face unprecedented challenges. Bitcoin’s historic four-year bull-and-bear cycles, which have guided investors for over a decade, are now under serious question. Moreover, leading financial experts increasingly argue that institutional adoption has fundamentally altered the market’s DNA.
Traditional Patterns
Traditional crypto markets have historically moved in predictable four-year cycles tied to Bitcoin’s halving events. However, major institutional players are now accumulating massive Bitcoin positions that dwarf previous retail-driven movements. The top 100 Bitcoin treasury companies collectively hold nearly one million Bitcoin, representing a seismic shift in market dynamics.
Furthermore, this institutional concentration represents approximately 4% of Bitcoin’s total supply. Companies like MicroStrategy alone hold over 628,000 Bitcoin worth roughly $72 billion. These treasury companies operate with long-term strategies that contrast sharply with the speculative retail trading that previously drove cyclical patterns.
Halving Events
Bitcoin’s halving mechanism, which historically triggered major price rallies, faces diminishing returns. Pierre Rochard, CEO of The Bitcoin Bond Company, notes that halvings are now “immaterial to trading float” since 95% of Bitcoin has already been mined. The remaining 5% of Bitcoin to be mined contributes minimally to supply dynamics.
Additionally, the supply-demand equation has fundamentally shifted. Instead of new coin issuance driving price action, existing holders (“OGs”) selling to institutional buyers now determines market movements. This transition from miner-driven supply to holder-driven transactions represents a structural change in how Bitcoin markets operate.
Wall Street Changes Everything
The approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024 marked a watershed moment for institutional adoption. These funds now manage over $154 billion in combined assets, with BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust alone holding more than 700,000 Bitcoin. This massive capital influx operates on multi-year investment horizons rather than speculative trading cycles.
Moreover, traditional finance integration continues accelerating. Exchange-traded funds provide institutional investors with regulated access to Bitcoin exposure without the operational complexity of direct custody. This accessibility has attracted pension funds, endowments, and asset managers who previously avoided cryptocurrency markets entirely.
Expert Opinions Split on Cycle’s Future
Matthew Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise Asset Management, firmly believes the four-year cycle is “dead”. He argues that institutional forces now operate on 5-10 year timelines, overwhelming traditional cyclical patterns. Hougan predicts 2026, not 2025, will be Bitcoin’s next major “up year,” breaking from expected cycle timing.
However, not all experts agree. Crypto analyst CRYPTO₿IRB argues the cycle remains mathematically embedded in Bitcoin’s code and cannot be “canceled”. He suggests ETFs actually strengthen four-year cycles by aligning crypto with traditional finance’s presidential election cycles, increasing the “crypto-tradfi correlation”.
Macroeconomic
Market dynamics increasingly respond to broader economic conditions rather than Bitcoin-specific events. Martin Burgherr, Chief Clients Officer at Sygnum Bank, explains that macroeconomic conditions, regulatory developments, and institutional capital flows now rival halving cycles in market influence. The four-year framework has become “one of several inputs rather than the market’s central script.”
Interest rate environments also play a more significant role. Unlike previous cycles marked by rising rates, current monetary policy favors risk assets like Bitcoin. This macro alignment supports sustained growth rather than boom-bust patterns that characterized earlier market cycles.
The debate over Bitcoin’s cyclical nature ultimately reflects a broader question about cryptocurrency’s future role in global finance. As institutional adoption accelerates and regulatory clarity improves, traditional patterns may give way to new market dynamics shaped by corporate treasuries, ETF flows, and macroeconomic conditions rather than halving-driven scarcity narratives.
Written By Fazal Ul Vahab C H
The post Is the Four-Year Crypto Cycle Over? What Experts Are Saying in 2025 appeared first on Trade Brains.